---

Rebuilding the Lineup Through Data, Realistic Trade Paths, and Pitching Surplus Strategy

The Yomiuri Giants enter the 2025 off-season in a transformative moment.
With Kazuma Okamoto expected to pursue an MLB opportunity via the posting system, the Giants must rebuild their lineup more aggressively than at any point in the past several seasons.

Their needs are clear and well-defined:

• Heavy reliance on right-handed power
• Lack of left-handed gap-to-gap and long-ball threats
• Insufficient offensive production from the middle infield
• Volatile outfield defense and limited range
• Inconsistent on-base skills across the lineup

In this article, we break down the ideal acquisition strategy, fully optimized for modern roster-building—and rooted in a combination of data analysis and realistic trade feasibility.

---

🔶 Core Strategy: The Giants Must Build Around Three Pillars

1. A left-handed power bat (corner outfield or 1B/3B)
2. A meaningful upgrade at shortstop or second base
3. A defensive stabilizer in center or right field

These three pillars define the 2025 roster blueprint.
Below is the complete position-by-position plan.

---

🔥 1. Outfield Acquisition Plan (Top Priority)

① A Left-Handed Gap-to-Gap / Power-Hitting Outfielder

This is the single most impactful upgrade the Giants can make.

Ideal Profile

• Left-handed hitter
• Gap-to-gap power with 15–25 HR capability
• OPS .750–.830
• Age 25–31
• Average or better defender

Expected Role

• Hit 5th or 6th
• Serve as the “secondary middle-order anchor” after Okamoto
• Add lineup depth directly behind the clean-up spot

👉 If the Giants solve only one need this winter, it must be this one.

---

② A Defense-First Center Fielder or Right Fielder

Outfield defense has swung dramatically year over year. The team needs stability above all.

Ideal Profile

• Plus speed
• Wide defensive range
• Strong arm (especially for RF candidates)
• OPS .650–.720 acceptable

Expected Role

• Stabilize UZR/DRS
• Serve as defensive replacement + pinch-runner
• Reduce defensive burden on young starters

👉 “You don’t need to hit if you can truly defend” applies more to the Giants than nearly any NPB team.

---

🔥 2. Corner Infield (1B / 3B): Reinventing the Heart of the Order

① A Left-Handed Middle-Order Slugger

With Okamoto gone, the Giants lose their No. 4 hitter, their top slugger, and a central lineup identity.

Ideal Profile

• Left-handed slugger
• Plays 1B or 3B
• SLG .450–.500
• Fits the No. 4–5 lineup slot

Expected Role

• Replace a significant share of Okamoto’s lost slugging
• Maintain intimidation in the middle of the order
• Balance the right-handed-heavy offense

👉 A foreign acquisition is possible, but a domestic left-handed slugger would be the dream scenario.

---

🔥 3. Middle Infield: Raising the Team’s Offensive and Defensive Floor

① An OBP-Driven Shortstop or Second Baseman

Consistency has been elusive for multiple seasons.

Ideal Profile

• OBP above .330
• Tough at-bats at the bottom/middle of the lineup
• Defense from average to slightly above

Expected Role

• Prevent lineup “dead zones”
• Sustain run creation
• Provide a stable presence through a full season

---

② A Defense-First Utility Infielder (SS/2B Capable)

Every contending team needs one—and the Giants need one badly.

Ideal Profile

• Reliable shortstop defense
• Plays second base and possibly 3B/OF
• Above-average baserunning
• Minimum OBP competence (.300+)

Expected Role

• Late-inning defensive replacement
• Emergency coverage across the infield
• Major boost to bench flexibility

👉 This is the most acquirable yet highly useful type of player.

---

🔥 4. Catcher: Quiet but High-Impact Upgrade

① A Bat-Capable No. 2 Catcher

The goal: make the catching corps deeper, not replace the starter.

Ideal Profile

• OPS .650–.700
• Reliable receiver
• Handles young pitchers well
• Plays 60–80 games

Expected Role

• Reduce lineup holes
• Prevent overworking the No.1 catcher
• Offer flexibility for pitcher-catcher matchups

---

🔥 The Five-Slot Acquisition Roadmap

1. Left-handed power OF (top priority)
2. Left-handed slugger at 1B/3B
3. Offensive middle infielder or elite utility defender
4. Defense-first CF/RF
5. Bat-capable No. 2 catcher

---

🔥 Recommended Priority Ranking

1. Left-handed power bat (OF / 1B / 3B)
2. Defensive OF (CF/RF)
3. Middle-infield offensive improvement
4. Catching depth
5. Foreign-player flexibility for late-window additions

---

🔥 Trade Package Blueprints (Fully English Version)

Below are the fully rewritten, English-native versions of the trade packages—no Japanese, no direct translations, just fluent baseball front-office language.

---

TYPE A: Left-Handed Power Bat (Corner OF / 1B / 3B)

Package A-1 (Standard Offer)

• Young RHP (projectable, early first-team experience)
• Bench infielder/outfielder in their 20s
• Cash considerations or depth-value equivalent

Package A-2 (Aggressive Offer)

• Young RHP
• MLB-ready relief RHP
• Utility outfielder

👉 Because left-handed power is scarce, two pitchers plus a depth bat is the most realistic path.

---

TYPE B: Defense-First CF/RF

Package B-1 (Cost-Efficient)

• Young RHP
• Cash or depth infielder

Package B-2 (Starter-Level Defender)

• Mid-20s RHP with rotation upside
• Infield prospect

👉 A true plus defender rarely moves for a single pitcher.

---

TYPE C: Offensive Middle Infielder (SS/2B)

Package C-1 (Prospect-Level Acquisition)

• Young RHP with starter potential
• Outfield prospect

Package C-2 (Regular Starter-Level Acquisition)

• Future-rotation RHP
• Bench utility player
• Additional value (cash or depth)

👉 Hitters at SS/2B are a premium asset everywhere.

---

TYPE D: Utility Defender

Package D-1 (Most Realistic)

• Early-20s RHP
• Cash considerations

Package D-2 (Higher-End Utility)

• Relief RHP
• Infield prospect

---

TYPE E: No. 2 Catcher with a Competent Bat

Package E-1 (Balanced Offer)

• Relief RHP

Package E-2 (For Better-Offensive Catchers)

• Young RHP + cash considerations

👉 Teams rarely trade catchers unless pitching is involved.

---

🔥 Final Takeaway (SEO-Friendly Summary)

The defining question of the Giants’ 2025 off-season is simple:
How effectively can they convert their surplus of young pitching into the left-handed power and defensive stability their lineup desperately needs?
The decisions made this winter will shape the Giants’ competitive future from 2026 through 2028.

---